Corrupt Federal Judges

Federal judges have far too much power in our nation

The Corrupt Judge, artist Battista Angolo del Moro

---

We are seeing President Trump make impressive gains in exposing corrupt federal officials, outrageous spending (USAID) and in reducing regulations, while at the same time getting much needed help to people who have been subject to natural disasters as well as severe economic conditions brought on by the last administration.

One of the worst barriers President Trump currently faces is interference by corrupt federal judges who, at the behest of corrupt and evil politicians, are issuing Temporary Restraining Orders (TROs) against many of President Trump’s Executive Orders, including those concerning DOGE.

Manhattan-based U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer issued the middle-of-the-night order after an emergency request by 19 Democratic attorneys general warning that the efforts by Musk’s so-called Department of Government Efficiency allies to take control of Treasury’s sensitive payment systems — which have access to personal information of millions of Americans and the government’s financial transactions — were putting their residents at risk. SOURCE

Unfortunately, it is EXTREMELY difficult to purge corrupt judges from their positions. Using the Deepthink Large Language Model (not DeepSeek) I asked for details about how we can remove these corrupt, evil judges from power. It’s not easy…

The process for removing a federal judge from power involves specific constitutional and statutory mechanisms designed to ensure judicial independence while providing accountability. Here’s a detailed breakdown of the legal process:

1. Impeachment by Congress (House of Representatives)

• Initiation: The House of Representatives can initiate the removal process through impeachment.

• Grounds for Impeachment:

  • High Crimes and Misdemeanors: This is a broad term that can include any serious breach of duty or abuse of power. For example, issuing a TRO based on what appears to be an obvious legal issue might be seen as misconduct if it’s clear the judge overstepped their bounds.

• Impeachment Resolution: If a simple majority in the House votes to impeach, the judge is impeached.

2. Trial by Senate

• Necessary Majority: The case then moves to the Senate for a trial.

• Required Vote: A two-thirds majority of Senators (67 out of 100) must vote to convict and remove the judge from office.

• Process:

  • The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court presides over the trial if the President or Vice President is on trial; for a federal judge, it is typically a Senator pro tempore chosen by the Senate.

  • Witnesses may be called, and both sides present their case.

  • A final vote determines whether the judge should be removed.

3. Special Impeachment Trial

• In some cases, Congress can set up a special impeachment trial for federal judges who are subject to specific statutory grounds for removal (e.g., judges on lower courts like U.S. District Courts or Courts of Appeals).

4. Statutory Removal

• For certain lower court judges, there are statutory procedures that allow for their removal:

  • U.S. District Court Judges: There is no statutory procedure to remove a U.S. District Court judge through the impeachment process; instead, they must wait for retirement or resignations.

  • Circuit Judges and Supreme Court Justices: These judges cannot be removed by the same procedures as lower court judges; their removal would also require impeachment and subsequent Senate trial.

5. Other Removal Mechanisms

• Retirement: Judges are expected to serve for life, but they can retire.

• Resignation: Judges can choose to resign from their positions if they feel it is in the best interest of the court or the public.

Summary:

• Impeachment and Removal by Congress through a process involving both the House of Representatives (initiation) and the Senate (trial and conviction).

• Statutory Grounds: For some judges, there may be specific statutory grounds for removal that are separate from impeachment.

• Independence and Accountability: The system is designed to balance independence with accountability, ensuring that federal judges can serve without fear of political interference but also face consequences for serious misconduct.

This process ensures that the judiciary remains independent while holding accountable those who engage in improper conduct.

So, the next question is how to change the law so that it’s not so burdensome to remove corrupt federal judges. The answer, also provided by Deepthink, is no more promising…

Changing the law regarding lifetime appointments for federal judges or simplifying the process to remove them from power is a complex and politically sensitive issue. Here’s an overview of how such changes might be made:

Changing Lifetime Appointments

1. Amending the Constitution:

   • The most significant change would require amending the U.S. Constitution.

     • Article V Process: The amendment process requires either a two-thirds vote in both houses of Congress or a constitutional convention called by two-thirds of state legislatures.

     • Ratification: Once proposed, an amendment must be ratified by three-fourths (38) of the states.

2. Statutory Changes:

   • Modifying existing statutes that govern judges' terms and appointments can be done through legislative action in Congress.

     • Congressional Action: Both chambers would need to pass a bill, and the President would have to sign it into law.

     • Judicial Review: The Supreme Court could review any such changes for constitutionality.

Simplifying the Process to Remove Federal Judges

1. Amending the Constitution:

   • Again, amending the U.S. Constitution is the most significant change and requires a two-thirds vote in both chambers of Congress or a constitutional convention called by state legislatures, followed by ratification by three-fourths of the states.

2. Statutory Changes:

   • Congress can pass legislation to modify the current processes for removing judges.

     • Impeachment: Congress could potentially change the grounds for impeachment or simplify the process required to convict and remove a judge from office.

       • Amending Impeachment Procedures: Changing the rules for impeaching judges, such as requiring a lower threshold in the House or Senate.

       • Simplifying Senate Trials: Modifying the procedures for Senate trials to make them more efficient or less subject to political gridlock.

Legislative and Judicial Process

1. Introduction of Legislation:

   • Members of Congress can introduce bills that propose changes to federal judges' appointment terms or the process of removing them.

     • House Committee: Bills would first be introduced in either the House Judiciary Committee or Senate Judiciary Committee.

     • Committee Hearings and Markup: The committee would hold hearings, gather testimony, and make amendments before the bill is ready for a full vote.

2. Bipartisan Support:

   • Passing such legislation often requires bipartisan support to navigate the political landscape effectively.

     • Consensus Building: Engaging with stakeholders, including legal experts, advocacy groups, and lawmakers from both parties.

3. Presidential Action:

   • Once a bill is passed by Congress, it would be sent to the President for signature or veto.

     • Veto Override: If the President vetoes the bill, Congress can override the veto with a two-thirds majority in both chambers.

Judicial Review

1. Supreme Court Review:

   • Any new laws regarding judges' appointments or removal processes would be subject to judicial review by the Supreme Court.

     • The court could determine whether these changes are constitutional and within the bounds of existing legal frameworks.

Summary

• Amending the Constitution: Requires a significant and complex process involving Congress, state legislatures, and ratification by states.

• Statutory Changes: Can be done through regular legislative processes but may require bipartisan support to pass and withstand judicial review.

Given the complexity and political sensitivity of these issues, any attempt to change lifetime appointments or simplify the removal process would likely face significant hurdles. However, if there is strong bipartisan support, it could lead to meaningful reforms.

As you can see, President Trump has a great deal of work ahead of him in the next four years. Fortunately he has assembled a team of the best, smartest and most capable men and women to support him in his task of saving our country and destroying the deep state. We should not understimate him or his team, but we must also not underestimate the danger that a vicious, monstrously evil entity that has been cornered presents. We must be cautious.